[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Axiom-developer] efficiency

From: Page, Bill
Subject: RE: [Axiom-developer] efficiency
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:41:38 -0400


On Thursday Renaud refers to a bug and to "a new version" of
the code that he sent to you. Is that new version in the Axiom

Bill Page.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: root [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:05 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] efficiency
> Camm,
> As I understand the issue the original comparison was flawed.
> (Renaud, please correct me if I'm wrong).
> There were two versions of the code, one with debugging enabled
> and one without. The GCL/Axiom was run with debugging, the NAG
> version without.
> I performed the same tests using the same source code and the
> results are comparable. There was just a minor misunderstanding
> about comparing debugging vs non-debugging code. This was cleared
> up later.
> Tim

> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 6:51 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Axiom-developer] performance issues solved
> Dear Axiom lovers,
> The issue I had with the version of my Real Closure Package 
> is solved. I was not using the same sources for the different
> versions.
> The issue came because version 1.1 was released too early 
> with Axiom 2.3 and still contained problems. When I fixed a
> bug in January, I fixed it from the NAG version and not from
> my version which contains more code.
> I have sent Tim the new version. Here is the example I used.
> ...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]