[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation)
From: |
Martin Rubey |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation) |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:23:08 +0200 |
Bob McElrath writes:
> I would personally mark output blocks when it is known that they need to be
> re-evaluated.
I think I like this idea.
> An option could turn on forced re-evaluation. Personally, I would not turn
> that on...but students working on relatively simple worksheets would
> probably like it. Also I think each output block should keep timing
> information. The kernel could intelligently decide not to re-evaluate
> something that took 10 minutes last time, but go ahead and re-evaluate
> things that took 10 ms last time.
Well, that's ok too, but I'd turn it off...
Martin
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation), William Sit, 2005/06/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation), Page, Bill, 2005/06/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation), Page, Bill, 2005/06/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation), Page, Bill, 2005/06/23
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Consistency (was Lazy Evaluation), William Sit, 2005/06/23