Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: )set functions compile on

[Martin Rubey]

But, on the other hand, I think we should really track down the cause of the
frequent failures when working without )se fu co on

I suspect that this could lead to some insights about how the interpreter
differs from the compiler, and it should be a priority goal to make the
semantics of both the same.

I'm unable to do this, I'd like to stick to the algebra part of Axiom. But who
is in charge of interpreter and compiler?

Martin

root writes:
 > Bill,
 > 
 > I've merged Peter's Aldor changes and am going to recompile the system.
 > I'll do two builds, one with 
 >   )set functions compile off
 > and one with 
 >   )set functions compile on
 > and see what breaks.
 > 
 > If nothing breaks then I have no objections to changing the default.
 > 
 > Tim
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Axiom-developer mailing list
 > address@hidden
 > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer