[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
From: |
Waldek Hebisch |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:09:49 +0200 (CEST) |
Bill Page wrote:
> I think we should ask Norman Ramsey about this "name mangling".
>
> Does it have a nice solution that would allow us to use
> the version(s) of noweb distributed by Debian?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Waldek Hebisch [mailto:address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
> >
> >
> > Bill Page wrote:
> > > On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For example latex run on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the
> > > > following errors (I removedother messages which are caused by
> > > > the two errors):
> > > >
> > > > ! Missing $ inserted.
> > > > <inserted text>
> > > > $
> > > > l.13 ...aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_
> > > >
> > > > aux.h}\endmoddef\nwstartde...
> > > > ...
> >
> > On 32-bit Debian Sarge with "nowebm 2.10c-3.2" I get the output you
> > show. But on 64-bit Debian testing/unstable using "nowebm 2.10c-3.3"
> > I get:
> >
> > \section{parse\_aux.h}
> > \nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_au
> > x.h}\endmoddef\nwstartdeflinemarkup\nwenddeflinemarkup
> > \LA{}license\RA{}
> >
> >
Correction: both verion of noweb give the same result. The real reason
is that parse_aux.pamphlet in build-improvements is modified:
--- ../../silver/axiom/src/hyper/parse_aux.pamphlet 2006-10-20
23:54:15.000000000 +0200
+++ parse_aux.pamphlet 2006-10-22 19:42:42.000000000 +0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
\tableofcontents
\eject
\section{parse\_aux.h}
-<<parseaux.h>>=
+<<parse_aux.h>>=
<<license>>
#ifndef _PARSE_AUX_H_
#define _PARSE_AUX_H_ 1
and three similar chunks.
--
Waldek Hebisch
address@hidden
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/21
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex,
Waldek Hebisch <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22