[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf
From: |
Bill Page |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:08:32 -0500 |
On November 2, 2006 10:37 AM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> > > ...
> > > fails on MAC OSX PPC
> > >
> > > config.status: creating po/Makefile.in
> > > config.status: executing depfiles commands
> > > config.status: executing default commands
> > > file=./`echo fr | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \
> > > && rm -f $file && PATH=../src:$PATH msgfmt -o $file fr.po
> > > /bin/sh: line 1: msgfmt: command not found
> > > make[3]: *** [fr.gmo] Error 127
> > > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> > > make: *** [binutils/bfd/libbfd.a] Error 2
> > > sh-2.05b#
> > >
> >
> > msgfmt is part of gettext. You need the following options to
> > encourage gcl to use it's own built-in version of gettext:
> >
> > ./configure --enable-locbfd --disable-statsysbfd
> >
> > These should be the default of MAC OSX
>
> Actually that fails also with the same output.
>
???
Are you double sure of this? Your result doesn't make sense
because gcl internally builds it's own version of gettext
as part of the bfd build and finds msgfmt there *internally*.
This works for me on the MAC OSX that I have been using.
> The apt-get worked for debian-style systems like debian and
> ubuntu.
>
> Yum does not know about binutils-dev which is a debian package
> so Fedora 6 still won't build. I searched for the binutils-dev
> equivalent but have not yet found it.
You should not have to install binutils-dev *if* you ask gcl
to use it's own built-in version.
>
> There is no apt-get or yum tool for the MAC that I can find.
>
You don't need to install binutils so you don't need
apt-get or yum.
Regards,
Bill Page.
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, root, 2006/11/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Alfredo Portes, 2006/11/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Alfredo Portes, 2006/11/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, root, 2006/11/02
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Bill Page, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Camm Maguire, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, root, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Alfredo Portes, 2006/11/02
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf,
Bill Page <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Camm Maguire, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, root, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Camm Maguire, 2006/11/06
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: gcl-2.6.8pre, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Camm Maguire, 2006/11/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: sock_get_string_buf, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/02