axiom-developer
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: gcl-2.6.8pre on MAC OSX 10.2


From: Gabriel Dos Reis
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: gcl-2.6.8pre on MAC OSX 10.2
Date: 04 Nov 2006 06:41:52 +0100

"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:

| On November 3, 2006 2:16 PM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
| > 
| > Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > > Waldek Hebisch <address@hidden> writes:
| > >
| > > | Not yet.  In a message that I sent few minutes ago I proposed to
| > > | rename 'poly.ht' to 'polys.ht' and 'poly.pht' to 'polys.pht'.
| > > 
| > > Please go ahead and commit to build-improvements.  Add an 
| > > explanation (in the pamphlets) about the renaming.
| > 
| > Commited.  But after extra checking I see more problem.  Namely
| > in 'src/hyper/bitmaps' we have the following pairs:
| > 
| > xi.bitmap Xi.bitmap
| > upsilon.bitmap Upsilon.bitmap
| > theta.bitmap Theta.bitmap
| > sigma.bitmap Sigma.bitmap
| > psi.bitmap Psi.bitmap
| > pi.bitmap Pi.bitmap
| > phi.bitmap Phi.bitmap
| > omega.bitmap Omega.bitmap
| > lambda.bitmap Lambda.bitmap
| > gamma.bitmap Gamma.bitmap
| > delta.bitmap Delta.bitmap
| > 
| > aTx=b.bitmap ATX=B.bitmap
| > 
| > The first group consists of images of greek letters, version with
| > lowercase name is lowercase letter, while uppercase letter has
| > the first letter of filename in upper case.
| >
| 
| I suggest the following changes:
| 
| s/Xi.bitmap/xi-cap.bitmap/
| s/Upsilon.bitmap/upsilon-cap.bitmap/
| s/Theta.bitmap/theta-cap.bitmap/
| s/Sigma.bitmap/sigma-cap.bitmap/
| s/Psi.bitmap/psi-cap.bitmap/
| s/Pi.bitmap/pi-cap.bitmap/
| s/Phi.bitmap/phi-cap.bitmap/
| s/Omega.bitmap/omega-cap.bitmap/
| s/Lambda.bitmap/lambda-cap.bitmap/
| s/Gamma.bitmap/gamma-cap.bitmap/
| s/Delta.bitmap/delta-cap.bitmap/

I agree.

| I think the following two files are not used anywhere:
| 
| aTx=b.bitmap
| ATX=B.bitmap
| 
| (See list of unused bitmap files below.)

How do we determine that they are referenced at run-time through
dynamic generation of their names?
It is because we know no such things exist?

| > Also in 'src/doc/ps' we have 'SEGBIND.ps' and 'segbind.ps'.  
| > 'segbind.ps' is a screen dump of a graphic window containing a
| > parabola.  I can not really see 'SEGBIND.ps' because it triggers
| > Postscript stack error in ghostscript (like many other files in
| > 'src/doc/ps' :(.
| > 
| 
| I think all .ps files that are not referenced in any *.pamphlet file
| (such as SEGBIND.ps and segbind.ps) should be deleted from the /ps
| directory.

Before deletion, we have to determine that they are not referenced at
runtime through name generation on the fly.  Do you know whether that
can ever happen?

-- Gaby




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]