[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: Literate documentation
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: Literate documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2007 20:22:24 -0500 (CDT) |
On Mon, 14 May 2007, address@hidden wrote:
| Gaby,
|
| http://www.ggcc.info appears to be a consortium of companies,
| not an open source project in the "axiom" sense.
Global GCC is a project *within* the ITEA 2 framework (which I pointed to in
an earlier message).
>From the web site above, you can read:
The GGCC project will last 30 months and is partly funded (around 30%-40%)
by French, Spanish and Swedish public authorities.
I think 30% is not negligible, when compared to zero :-)
| Sage appears to be a research project at the University of Washington,
| again not an open source project in the "axiom" sense.
http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
SAGE: Free Open Source Mathematics Software
http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ack.html
Financial and Infrastructure Support:
* University of Washington, Department of Mathematics (startup money)
* University of Washington / NSF, five undergraduates have been funded via
the NSF VIGRE grant.
* University of Washington, Dept. of Computer Science, for providing the
SAGE lab (Sieg Hall 312).
* University of Washington, Yi Qiang received a Mary Gates Scholarship.
* The National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0555776.
* MSRI -- two major workshops
* IPAM -- hosted and funded SAGE Days 3
| Both of these projects have a grant-managing offices.
But it remains a fact that NSF (and funding federal agencies) does support
open source (research) projects. Now, it may be that Axiom, in particular,
has problems getting funds; that is a whole different story that tracing that
federal agencies refusing to put money in mathematical computational open
source projects because there are commercial companies.
[...]
| The point of my post is that open source projects like Axiom,
| Rosetta, or Doyen cannot be funded under today's machinery as
| stand-alone projects. At least that's the statement of NSF and
| NIST program managers.
I'm not questioning what NSF and NIST program managers said.
I'm just pointing out at some facts and trying to match those with your
statements/conclusions.
-- Gaby
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Literate documentation, (continued)
[Axiom-developer] Literate documentation, daly, 2007/05/14
[Axiom-developer] Literate documentation, daly, 2007/05/14
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Literate documentation,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=