[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Axiom-developer] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Is

From: Bill Page
Subject: [Axiom-developer] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:01:17 -0500


On 12/13/07, you wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Bill Page wrote:
> | I am not against revising the status categories so they are
> | more specific and better organized but I do think it is essential
> | that we treat all versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on
> | the NewSynthesis Axiom Wiki. Doing things the way you
> | suggest does not seem sufficiently equitable to me.
> It is normal for people to preach for the religion they like the
> best.

Yes. I am glad for comments, questions or suggestions from anyone. But
actual material contributions are the best of all... :-)

> Bill, it is your project; so, I'll let you decide -- I appreciate your
> effort at being equitable.

The phrase "your project" might often be interpreted as a euphemism
for "don't expect any help from me" ;-) especially when something is
intended as a "community" effort.

Anyway now that we can support OpenAxiom on the Axiom Wiki I would
like to create some pages specifically to show off some of what is
different about OpenAxiom compared to the others. I have a little
start at that here:

I would like to expand this, add some useful documentation or
references to documentation and then make it a full-fledged "article"
page rather than just a "sandbox" page. If you or anyone in your group
would like to contribute to this, it would be a great help to me. So
far all that I have is what I can follow from your patches and posts
to the open-axiom list.

Bill Page.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]