[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 01:56:39 -0600
To quote the article:
"For many months the Lisp advocates pressed on. I was baffled.
Many extremely intelligent people I know and had much respect
for were praising Lisp with almost religious dedication. There
had to be something there, something I couldn't afford not to
get my hands on! Eventually my thirst for knowledge won me over.
...[snip].... And then I got it.
The enlightenment came instantaneously. One moment I understood
nothing, and the next moment everything clicked into place. I've
achieved nirvana. Dozens of times I heard Eric Raymond's statement
quoted by different people: "Lisp is worth learning for the profound
enlightenment experience you will have when you finally get it; that
experience will make you a better programmer for the rest of your
days, even if you never actually use Lisp itself a lot." I never
understood this statement. I never believed it could be true. And
finally, after all the pain, it made sense!. There was more truth
to it than I ever could have imagined. I've achieved an almost
divine state of mind, an instantaneous enlightenment experience
that turned my view of computer science on its head in less than
a single second"
> I COULD have written it as "strings" that read exactly like
> the original syntax but I gained several advantages by using
> lisp-like syntax.
> What you wrote is not just lisp-like, it *is* lisp
which, if you deeply understood what you said, would be a profound statement.
Either you "get it" or you don't. There is no half-way with Lisp.
There are no words to explain what it means to "get it" until you do
... and then there is no reason to explain it; you get it.
I wasn't trying to start a language debate. I was only trying to point
people at a very gentle introduction by someone who suddenly "got it"
and was trying to help others "see the whole elephant".
Why don't we just let this rest and not turn it into a debate.
[Axiom-developer] Lisp, daly, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, William Sit, 2008/03/03
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, Bill Page, 2008/03/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, Martin Rubey, 2008/03/05
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, Waldek Hebisch, 2008/03/05
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, Bill Page, 2008/03/05
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, Waldek Hebisch, 2008/03/06
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, 2008/03/06