[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bibulus-dev] Re: Splitting up IN... entries
From: |
Thomas M. Widmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Bibulus-dev] Re: Splitting up IN... entries |
Date: |
07 Apr 2003 20:56:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Arne Jørgensen <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Thomas M. Widmann) writes:
>
> > I've got an idea: Is there any reason to define the article and the
> > journal together, e.g.:
> > [...]
> > The same applies to InBook -> Book, InCollection -> Book and
> > InProceedings -> Proceedings.
>
> Cross referencing seems like a cleaner and better solutions. IMHO.
Glad you agree.
> > Currently, both are possible, but it makes the DTD rather complicated.
> > Furthermore, BibTeX will move a crossref'ed entry into the
> > crossref'ing entry if it is crossref'ed only once (actually defined by
> > the -min-crossrefs command line option to BibTeX), but AFAIK this
> > breaks if some entries are defined with crossrefs while other entries
> > are not.
> >
> > So my question is: Is there any need for allowing both (apart from
> > convenience when inputting the entry)?
>
> Doing things the right way is a good restriction ;-)
Yes. :-)
For what it's worth, I've now implemented splitting in bib2xml.bst
(the CVS version), so that we can test it out.
All protests are requested before the next release!
/Thomas
--
\author{Thomas Widmann\thanks{3/2, 54 Mavisbank Gardens, Glasgow G51\,1HL,
Scotland, address@hidden Tel.~+44 (141) 419\,9872.}\\{\tt address@hidden