Re: glr.c: Token definitions

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:

> I propose that newer skeletons define the tokens only using enums, not
> #defines in addition.  That's already the case for C++, but I propose
> that we do the same for glr.c.  In practice, it only means to apply

What about yacc.c?  It seems such a shame to be tied down by the yacc
standard forever.  What if the #define's disappear for %pure-parser?

Joel