Re: glr.c cleanup

[Joel E. Denny]

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Hans Aberg wrote:

> The "p" might be convenient if both variables are to be used side by side. 
> However, also consider the multilingual issue: it won't be needed under C++.

Because it will always be a pointer?  Or because it will always be an 
object?

> So in order to keep multilingual similarity, that suggests just naming it 
> "yystack", without a "p". Names with a "p" added should then be reserved for 
> C implementation variables, but not in the interface.

I don't believe yystack is part of the interface.

Joel