[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glr.c: Token definitions
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: glr.c: Token definitions |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:19:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> I agree. In fact I'm toying with a C++ wrapper around the glr.c
>> parser. It raised a few issues with the lalr1.cc parser that I'd like
>> to sort out so that glr.cc can be a drop-in replacement of lalr1.cc.
>> It's in very primitive state, but it's very doable. But first of all,
>> I'd like to clean up (again!) the lalr1.cc parser: there are a couple
>> of bad things, including the fact that these tokens are defined in the
>> top level namespace instead of instead the parser class... And many
>> other similar details.
> It will be great when you have all this fully implemented and documented.
> I might drop my own project if your skeletons prove easier to use and more
> stable.
Hi Joel,
Have you given a try to glr.cc?
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions,
Akim Demaille <=