[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:04:13 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> > Clearly either spelling is acceptable. It would make sense to
> > standardize on one. Personally I find myself in the (slight)
> > majority, and prefer "lookahead" without the hyphen
>
> I prefer it too.
>
> > but I'm too lazy to change everything myself.
>
> I suppose I can change this at some point if we're sure.
I'm taking a look at doing this.
Before I start, are we sure? I noticed this in NEWS under 2.0:
- The option `--report=lookahead' was changed to `--report=look-ahead'.
The old spelling still works, but is not documented and will be
removed.
Also, I have this feeling there's a special procedure associated with
editing "po/". Or can I just (carefully) search and replace?
Joel
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, (continued)
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/11
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Hilfinger, 2006/01/10
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Hilfinger, 2006/01/11
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/11
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/11
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/11
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/30
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/30
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/30
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/31