[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glr: include the created header

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: glr: include the created header
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:12:39 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> They're definitions mostly as opposed to just declarations.  I imagine 
> that's why it's called %defines and --defines.  So, I decided %pre-defines 
> and %post-defines makes more sense.

This all sounds OK (in that I can't simplify it much more :-) except
that the names are still confusing.  "%pre-defines" sounds like
predefined symbols, but then "%post-defines" would be -- what --
postdefined symbols?

How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
depending on context?  That would match %{...%}'s behavior.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]