Re: glr: include the created header

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> They're definitions mostly as opposed to just declarations.  I imagine 
> that's why it's called %defines and --defines.  So, I decided %pre-defines 
> and %post-defines makes more sense.

This all sounds OK (in that I can't simplify it much more :-) except
that the names are still confusing.  "%pre-defines" sounds like
predefined symbols, but then "%post-defines" would be -- what --
postdefined symbols?

How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
depending on context?  That would match %{...%}'s behavior.