Re: symbol declarations after rules

[Akim Demaille]

>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:

 > I was originally thinking the error messages would be easier to
 > implement even if only as a short-term fix.  However, I'm now
 > thinking it won't be too difficult to move the rule checks to after
 > parsing the entire grammar file.

I agree.  That's also what I'm aiming for.  Before implementing
%import, I would like to be able to transform the grammar step by
step, as if we were striping syntactic sugar.  Actions come at the
very end.