[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU Bison 2.3] testsuite: 103 104 failed

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: [GNU Bison 2.3] testsuite: 103 104 failed
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:35:32 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:

>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> IMHO, there are bits of *.c that should be factored in macros.

I agree.  But since I don't use C++ I was pretty cautious; I merely
fixed the bugs and didn't change the structure of the code, which
indeed has lots of duplicate stuff.

Partly this is lack of motivation, and partly I'm genuinely concerned
that I don't know the ins and outs of C++ well enough to be messing
with a parser generator for it.  Even doing this little fix took me
way too long, because I had to consult a C++ grammar to make sure I
was doing the right thing, and I have no idea how well that grammar
reflects C++ reality.

Maybe if someone who knows C++ well could take a look at it (hint,
hint,... :-).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]