[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: push parser implemenation

From: Bob Rossi
Subject: Re: push parser implemenation
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:40:11 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:33:03AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>> "Bob" == Bob Rossi <address@hidden> writes:
>  > Honestly, I don't understand why a pull parser needs this feature. If
>  > the only reason the pull parser had extra parameters via %parse-param
>  > was to pass those parameters to the lexer, then the push parser doesn't
>  > need this feature, since the user calls the lexer directly.
> You're forgetting auxiliary routines (yyerror, yyprint, yydestruct
> etc.).  Actually your work is almost to mimic what does, but
> with member functions being functions.  The parser struct must
> aggregate the parse-params, and provide it to the auxiliary functions.
> As for yyparse, do not forget about the %initial-action either.

Hi Akim,

It seems that Paul told me not to worry about %parse-param. Unless
decided otherwise, I'm not going to include it in the patch.

Bob Rossi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]