[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: push parser

From: Bob Rossi
Subject: Re: push parser
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:30:51 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:55:08PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bob Rossi <address@hidden> writes:
> > If we force the user to define that function, it add's an unnecessary 
> > complication to the push parser. That is, the user is mostly likely 
> > going to call yypushparse, and not care about yyparse at all. However,
> > yyparse is the function causing the user to define the yypushlex
> > function. What do you think I should do to resolve this?
> Ah, sorry, I didn't understand this issue at all.
> It sounds to me like the push parser shouldn't define yyparse.  That
> way, the user shouldn't have to care about any lexer function.

I agree. Akim, you were the main advocate for adding this functionality. Can
you see any other solution to the problem besides remove yyparse from
the generated output?

Bob Rossi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]