Re: FYI: default %printer/%destructor

[Hans Aberg]

On 22 Nov 2006, at 20:22, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> > You insist on using "( )", etc.
>
> I'm not insisting.  However, no one has proposed an alternative that
> works.

I think it is a tricky question. I would not want to rush ahead with it.

> As far as I can tell, you have agreed that there are problems with
> "exp.sum", "exp/sum", and "sum:exp".

No. Only the last one. You claimed there were some tokenization  
problems with the first two, but I didn't see it.

> You keep suggesting Unicode but you
> won't make a specific proposal other than something related to "- 
> >", which
> is not what we're talking about.

One would throw them in at need, when sitting down, trying to  
compiled the grammar.

  Hans Aberg