[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: experimental features in Bison 2.3a+

From: Hans Aberg
Subject: Re: experimental features in Bison 2.3a+
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:15:22 +0100

On 2 Dec 2006, at 06:23, Paul Eggert wrote:

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

It seems to me that the following features ought to be documented as
experimental since they have been somewhat controversial even among Bison

1. Default %destructor's and %printer's. These are currently declared
with <*> and <>.

2. The prologue alternatives: %code, %requires, %provides, and % code-top.

Yes.  Though to be honest I can't even remember what all of them are

I am too curious about that; especially %code: I suggested a %define for code placement to be called %code. And %requires, %provides sounds as though taken from LaTeX 2. But what is %code-top?

And isn't the technical word commonly used for experimental "unsupported", meaning that there is no official support for its stability.

  Hans Aberg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]