[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [updated PATCH] %language declaration

From: Joel E. Denny
Subject: Re: [updated PATCH] %language declaration
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:48:55 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> The main objection was that other people might then think about
> language-dependent parsing of the Bison skeleton (for example, as in Perl,
> because of clashes between the "$N"/"@N" variables, and the internal syntax of
> the language).

What's wrong with that?  Couldn't it prove to be necessary in order to 
support some languages?  If you would prefer to point me to a previous 
post, that's fine.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]