[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [updated PATCH] %language declaration

From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [updated PATCH] %language declaration
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:46:18 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20061025)

Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:

Seriously, though, this business about "experimental" is kind of
demoralizing for users who are reading the manual.  Why should they
invest their work in an "experimental" feature?

The C++ skeletons and %destructor seemed to do okay this way, but I don't know the full history there.

Yes, but I also think that we should not exaggerate.

Personally, I would not label as experimental even the requires/provides part (though I do find it a bit unnerving that we need %code-top...), as well as %language.

If it wasn't for the language conventions, I would have kept the ".tab" even in the Java output, as I don't like to depart too much from the traditional Bison behavior.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]