[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: push parser

From: Bob Rossi
Subject: Re: push parser
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:01:19 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 01:39:14AM -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > If you have a lot of patches that make up the final patch, you should
> > run the final patch through the benchmark script we were using. Just to
> > make sure that all of the new modes don't effect the speed of the
> > pure/unpure pull parsers.
> Thanks for that suggestion.  What do you think of the attached uncommitted 
> patch?  Also attached are the results that I get from etc/ after 
> applying all of this patch except the push.c portion.  Finally, attached 
> are the results after applying all of the patch.  Notice that, for pull 
> mode, switching from yacc.c to push.c has little impact.  However, the 
> impact of switching to push mode is improved by this patch.

These timing results look great to me.

The key component was obviously making sure the yacc impure/pure parser
was the same as the push impure/pure parser. These results obviously show 

Bob Rossi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]