[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposal: simplify prologue alternatives into %code

From: Hans Aberg
Subject: Re: proposal: simplify prologue alternatives into %code
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:01:57 +0100

On 9 Jan 2007, at 15:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

One reason against making this the required method of implementation, is that one may end up with a polymorphic class library, which uses its own way of extracting the objects.

Not a big case of interface mismatch.

If you think that, you are of course free to fix it your own way.

You idea is to let the C++ polymorphic class implementation to emulate the implementation of a C 'union', and such ties between unrelated features in different languages does not seem wise to me.

  Hans Aberg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]