[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFA] Java skeleton

From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [RFA] Java skeleton
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:25:13 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20061207)

Shortly speaking, yes, I don't think there will be new members.  We have the
precedent that Bison's interface did not change in many many years, and if it
did, it was always only when a particular %-directive was specified.

But we also have the precedent that Bison pretty much prefixes every symbol, right? Seems safer. I'm not sure I see much harm.

Not in the C++ skeleton, which I based the Java naming convention on. That's also why I have YYABORT, YYACCEPT, etc.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]