[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/3] {master} convert the conflict messages to a more bison-l

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] {master} convert the conflict messages to a more bison-like form
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:23:37 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0

On 09/23/2012 12:03 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Are there any evidence that there are languages in which there
> would be no possible translation like that one?

"No possible translation" doesn't sound likely, no, as
a translator can always come up with *something*.  But
it's plausible that all the possible translations would
be awkward.

I hadn't noticed the -Wconflicts-sr versus -Wconflicts-rr
business, sorry.  But in that case, how about something like
the following?

  foo.y: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected [-Wconflicts-sr]
  foo.y: reduce/reduce conflicts: 2 found, 0 expected [-Wconflicts-rr]

That's closer to the format you proposed, and it
avoids the complexity of ngettext.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]