[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/8] {master} revamp the handling of -W

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] {master} revamp the handling of -W
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:30:32 +0100

Le 14 févr. 2013 à 15:11, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> a écrit :

> This series of patches address a few shortcomings about the handling
> of warning categories:
> - Too much duplication.
> - Hairy code.
> - Théophile pointed out that supports for -Werror=foo has leaked
>  to -r and -f (and -ferror=caret, nonsensical, is accepted).
> - Joel pointed out that it would be nice to be able to enable
>  -Wempty-rule when %empty is used, except if -Wno-empty-rule is
>  set, which requires to tell the difference between a disabled
>  warning (-Wno-empty-rule), and a warning that was not enabled.
> I'd be happy to hear comments.  I shall apply these in a couple
> of days.  Then I'll proceed on %empty.

All pushed into master.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]