[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new pacification suggestion?

From: Hans Åberg
Subject: Re: new pacification suggestion?
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:06:32 +0100

> On 20 Nov 2018, at 21:32, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/20/18 12:01 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> -    if (false)
>> +    if ((false))
> This goes too far. If clang is warning about this sort of thing, then we 
> should disable that clang warning. Again, compilers should be our servants, 
> not our masters.

That seems a good idea. One I disabled is Clang enforcing the limited logical 
expression precedence levels of Pascal, forcing the use of unneeded extra 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]