[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme
From: |
Arash Zeini |
Subject: |
Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:05:13 -0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 21:15, ocean wrote:
> Arash will you please resend your reply to my
> partitioning scheme email? Because for some odd reason
> I haven't got it!
I am not sure I get what you want? You didn't ask the question, or are you
the same person with two different emails?
Arash
> --- "A. Sajjad Zaidi" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 01:48:02PM -0800, Arash
> >
> > Zeini wrote:
> > > On times I used to have three different distros on
> >
> > one laptop, but now I
> >
> > > have two and use a scheme like this:
> >
> > One thing that I actually tested for partitioning
> > was the performance of
> > different areas of the disk. Partitions at the
> > beginning had data
> > transfer rates upto 2x those at the end. Following
> > this, it makes sense
> > to put swap and often used data at the beginning.
> >
> > > /boot: 32 MB
> >
> > That might be a bit less if you plan on playing
> > around with kernels. I
> > usually give /boot about 70MB.
> >
> > > /: 5 GB
> >
> > I rarely give / more than 3-400MB. The reason is
> > that if something goes
> > wrong and starts filling up your disk space, / is
> > not the place you want
> > inaccessable.
> >
> > Here is what I would usually do with a 40GB disk on
> > a desktop system with
> > 256MB RAM and 2 distros:
> >
> > /boot: 70MB
> > /boot: 70MB (2nd distro)
> > <swap>: 1GB (shared)
> > /: 400MB
> > /: 400MB (2nd distro)
> > /tmp: 512MB
> > /tmp: 512MB (2nd distro)
> > /var: 1GB
> > /var: 1GB (2nd distro)
> > /usr: 7GB (mounted readonly)
> > /usr: 7GB (2nd distro) (mounted readonly)
> > /home: 10GB
> > /home: 10GB (2nd distro)
> >
> > Looks a bit cluttered, but there are quite a lot of
> > advantages of
> > separating the partitions. Some, like /var and /tmp
> > change very often
> > and have a higher chance of file system corruption.
> > And certain
> > exploits, such as those for hard-links, don't work
> > across partitions.
> >
> > By separating them, you can minimize issues like
> > this, though you do end
> > up wasting some space.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > --
> > A. Sajjad Zaidi
> > Sr.System Administrator
> > iinix Solutions (http://www.iinix.com/)
> > GnuPG Key ID: 0xD7AD0E13
> > "Bugs that go away by themselves tend to come back
> > by themselves."
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bna-linuxiran mailing list
> > address@hidden
>
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bna-linuxiran
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
> http://photos.yahoo.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bna-linuxiran mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bna-linuxiran
--
The FarsiKDE Project
www.farsikde.org
- [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, ocean, 2003/12/29
- [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, ocean, 2003/12/29
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, Arash Zeini, 2003/12/29
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, A. Sajjad Zaidi, 2003/12/30
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, Arash Zeini, 2003/12/30
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, ocean, 2003/12/31
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme,
Arash Zeini <=
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, Aryan Ameri, 2003/12/31
- Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, Arash Zeini, 2003/12/31
Re: [linuxiran] Best Partitioning Scheme, Aryan Ameri, 2003/12/31