bug-apl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-apl] Suggestions needed: Editing of named lambdas


From: Elias Mårtenson
Subject: Re: [Bug-apl] Suggestions needed: Editing of named lambdas
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 22:31:28 +0800

I think treating the lambdas just like any function is perfectly normal, and is exactly what any function languages does.

Now, functional languages also has lexical closures, but I'm not sure how easy it would be to take advantage of it, since APL programs usually doesn't take advantage of clearly-defined lexical scopes.

How does other APL's do it?

Regards,
Elias

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]