[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:37:51 -0700 |
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 12:21 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> I think that I should probably implement SQL∆with_transaction. It
> belongs in the SQL layer. It's also the only way to ensure that
> transaction rollback on error is handled correctly.
I agree that that's probably the right place to do it. Would it be in
the library (C) or in the wrapper (APL)?
I kind of like the operator approach (as in the component file code),
but my implementation might not be sufficiently general for other
applications.
- [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, Blake McBride, 2014/04/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] A really simple component-file implementation, David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/21