bug-apl
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[Bug-apl] Bug in 8○ function?
From
:
Elias Mårtenson
Subject
:
[Bug-apl] Bug in 8○ function?
Date
:
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:42:05 +0800
According to my documentation that I copied from the ISO spec,
8○
should be equivalent to:
(¯1-R⋆2)⋆0.5
and
¯8○
should be equal to
-(¯1-R×2)⋆0.5
.
In GNU APL the opposite happens. I.e.
¯8○
returns what
8○
is supposed to return and vice versa.
Is my analysis correct?
Regards,
Elias
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
[Bug-apl] Bug in 8○ function?
,
Elias Mårtenson
<=
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in 8○ function?
,
Juergen Sauermann
,
2015/04/18
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in 8○ function?
,
Blake McBride
,
2015/04/18
Prev by Date:
Re: [Bug-apl] Why is there a stack trace when I caused a length error?
Next by Date:
[Bug-apl] Why does make clean not remove the src .o files?
Previous by thread:
[Bug-apl] SEV_ERASED not sent to monitored variables when workspace is cleared on )LOAD
Next by thread:
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in 8○ function?
Index(es):
Date
Thread