[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] RNG
|
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] RNG |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2016 19:29:33 +0200 |
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
(...)
> relying on ¯1=2⊥64⍴1 (always a 64-bit signed integer), for which Dyalog
> does differently.
I think this is a bug.
-k
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/17
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/05/17
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/17
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/05/19