bug-apl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-apl] svn 863 make warning/error


From: enztec
Subject: Re: [Bug-apl] svn 863 make warning/error
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:34:34 -0700

nice

i'm guessing this problem was not in my compiler's compilation .. but in 
something they changed/added to the compiler since my version (4.4.3) ? 


On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:30:49 +0100
Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I see, then it is probably gone since I reworked that area.
> 
> BTW I have started to move all static object constructors to a single
> file, which gives more control over the construction order and avoids
> different orders with different compilers.
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> On 02/01/2017 08:17 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> it was the get_name line you added in Id.cc 
> 
> Core was generated by `/usr/local/apl-svn/bin/apl -v'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0  0x08093b9b in std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits<char> >::widen 
> (cond=0x8279234 "result", 
>     fun=0x824d573 "get_name", file=0x824d32e "Id.cc", line=85)
>     at 
> /usr/local/gcc/lib/gcc/i686-enztec-linux-gnu/4.4.3/../../../../include/c++/4.4.3/bits/basic_ios.h:440
> 440           { return __check_facet(_M_ctype).widen(__c); }
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:51:41 +0100
> Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I wasn't able to decipher the core. It is difficult if the core was 
> dumped from a binary that differs
> from your own sources. It says:
> 
> *...**
> **#9  0x082fba5c in VH_entry::history ()**
> **#10 0xbfb167b8 in ?? ()**
> **Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)**
> **(gdb) **
> *
> It would be helpful if you could load the core into gdb on your system 
> and send me the
> backtrace displayed by gdb.
> 
> I also fixed x⎕AV in *SVN 874* - I am getting too old for all of this.
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/01/2017 07:02 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> Indeed you did
> btw you left the 'debug' x⎕AV in the Id.def    ;)
> 
> here is the apl start  (i added the change in Symbol.cc to test and didn't 
> have to do the change in Id.def)
> 
> name:                '⎕' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍞' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕AI' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕ARG' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                'x⎕AV' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕CT' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕EM' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕ET' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕FC' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕IO' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕L' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕LC' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕LX' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PP' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PR' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PS' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PW' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕R' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕RL' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕SVE' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕SYL' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕TC' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕TS' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕TZ' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕UL' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕X' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕WA' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                'λ' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍺' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍵' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                'χ' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍶' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍹' at Symbol.cc:50
> 
> 
>        )wsid
> IS CLEAR WS
>        )save xyz
> 2017-02-01  10:51:46 (GMT-7)
>        )load xyz
> name:                '⎕CT' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕FC' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕IO' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕L' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕LX' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PP' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PR' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PS' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕PW' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕R' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕RL' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕SYL' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕TZ' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⎕X' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                'λ' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍺' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍵' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                'χ' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍶' at Symbol.cc:50
> name:                '⍹' at Symbol.cc:50
> SAVED 2017-02-01 10:51:46 (GMT-7)
>        )wsid
> IS xyz
> 
> ---
> 
> Post debrief
> 
> was there a source code change step after the 'core dump' that you did to 
> figure this out ? or did you figure it out from the the core?
> I'd like to save this work as a case study type thing (it was a pretty 
> interesting set of circumstances)
> 
> ---
> 
> your progrmming talents are supreme - maybe you can take a look at my apl 
> code that causes my rasp pi running this 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digi-Comp_I to get stuck between floors of my 
> elevator ;)
> ^^ bad humour
> 
> thanks  Jürgen   this was a great process to go through
> Ps I'll wait a few days to get back the the    ⍝ ∇   and    clear 
> screen/cursor location situation
> 
> though here :
> /usr/bin/clear | hexdump -c    or -C for hex    -c gives ascii
> 0000000 033   [   H 033   [   2   J
> 0000007
> 
> ====
> 
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:07:27 +0100
> Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I believe I found the problem.
> 
> It looks like the constructor for the Workspace object (containing all system 
> variables)
> was called before the constructors for the system variables were called. That 
> made the
> names of the system variables empty strings.
> 
> The compiler has some freedom regarding the order of initialization of static 
> objects
> and your compiler has chosen different order than mine.
> 
> Hopefully fixed in SVN 872.
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> On 01/31/2017 11:47 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> core dump - i bz2'ed it and attached it
> 
> 
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:39:01 +0100
> Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> sorry, should read:
> 
> Q(ID::get_name(id))   // ← new line
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> On 01/31/2017 11:28 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Q(name(ID::get_name(id)))   // ← new line
> Q(name.size())              // ← another new line
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]