[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] indexing precedence
|
From: |
Xiao-Yong Jin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] indexing precedence |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:44:18 -0600 |
ISO/IEC 13751:2000(E) disagrees.
On page 158, section 10.2.14 Indexed Reference,
there is an example
1 2 3[2]
2
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Xiao-Yong,
>
> IBM APL2.
>
> [] binds stronger than anything else.
>
> Thus 3[1 2] is evaluated first, giving the RANK ERROR.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 02/15/2017 09:14 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>> Feature or bug?
>>
>> 1 2 3[2 1 3]
>> RANK ERROR
>> 1 2 3[2 1 3]
>> ^^
>> )sic
>> (1 2 3)[2 1 3]
>> 2 1 3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>