bug-apl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU APL now requires bash shell and in-tree builds


From: Dr . Jürgen Sauermann
Subject: Re: GNU APL now requires bash shell and in-tree builds
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:16:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

Hi Brian,

understood. However, sys/socket.h is directly #included in main.cc (line 38).

The question is then why bind() and, for example, accept(), which are both declared in
sys/socket.h and are both used in main.cc in behave so differently as to the need for ::
and only in BSD?

And why would an extern "C" wrapper around it change the behaviour in main.cc but is
not needed in all other *.cc files that happily use bind() without :: ?

Looking at the error message posted by Alexander:

main.cc:301:8: error: value of type '<const int &, const sockaddr *, unsigned long>' is not contextually convertible to 'bool'
   if (bind(listen_socket, (const sockaddr *)&local, sizeof(local)))
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

then apparently the compiler assumes that bind() does not return int (as declared
in sys/socket.h) but something else (maybe an enum?). Or maybe it is a compiler fault?
Best Regards,
Jürgen


On 4/13/21 2:54 AM, Callahan, Brian Robert wrote:
Hi Jürgen --

Per POSIX, bind requires the inclusion of sys/socket.h, so that should be in the includes list for main.cc if there is a call to bind in main.cc. I'm not sure we can or should assume an implicit include from elsewhere.

https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/bind.html

As for needing the scope-resolution on bind, that is something that someone (i.e., me or Alexander) should look further into.

~Brian


Brian Robert Callahan, Ph.D.
Lecturer, ITWS@RPI
Office: Lally 304

From: Bug-apl [bug-apl-bounces+callab5=rpi.edu@gnu.org] on behalf of Dr. Jürgen Sauermann [mail@xn--jrgen-sauermann-zvb.de]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 5:47 AM
To: Alexander Shendi; bug-apl@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNU APL now requires bash shell and in-tree builds

Hi Alexander,

thanks, fixed in SVN 1470.

The bind() error is somewhat strange because:

- in the same file (main.cc), accept() (a companion of bind()) works without :: and
- in other files bind() also works without ::

I suppose some other #include file declares bind() differently (which
would be an error in the platform).

Best Regards,
Jürgen


On 4/11/21 10:53 PM, Alexander Shendi wrote:
Dear list,

I tried out SVN 1468, but still had to modify the following files
*   . /configure (replace "source" with ".")
*   . /src/main.cc (replace "bind" with "::bind" on line 300

Thanks in advance for your help.

/Alexander

Am 11. April 2021 15:26:44 MESZ schrieb "Callahan, Brian Robert" <callab5@rpi.edu>:
Hello --

In fixing Alexander's issue, I found these lines in the GNU APL
Makefile I have never seen before:
buildtag.hh: Makefile buildtag.sh
       source ${top_srcdir}/buildtag.sh
       touch $@

The source command is a bash built-in and won't work on other shells,
like OpenBSD ksh.

Additionally, even with bash, this command does not work if doing an
out-of-tree build, which is the way I have always built GNU APL and
which autotools are supposed to make easy to do.

Thanks.

~Brian

________________________________
Brian Robert Callahan, Ph.D.
Lecturer, ITWS@RPI
Office: Lally 304
--
Ceci n'est pas un courriel.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]