[Bug tree-optimization/94905] [10/11 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
      Known to fail|                            |11.2.1
      Known to work|                            |12.0
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection
   Last reconfirmed|2020-09-03 00:00:00         |2022-1-21
            Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] Bogus |[10/11 Regression] Bogus
                   |warning                     |warning
                   |-Werror=maybe-uninitialized |-Werror=maybe-uninitialized

--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The diagnostic is gone with GCC 12 as we there pattern-recognize a memcpy:

  <bb 2> [local count: 119292720]:
  insert_axis_len.0_1 = insert_axis_len;
  ret ={v} {CLOBBER};
  ret.rho[0] = insert_axis_len.0_1;
  __builtin_memcpy (_3(D), &ret, 32);
  ret ={v} {CLOBBER};
  return _3(D);

and the partial uninitialized read from it is not what the uninit pass can
diagnose (it's memory walking stops at the first may-def, it does not
prune must-def ranges).  But even with -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns
-fno-tree-vectorize where we get similar IL as with GCC 11 we do not warn so I
wonder
what fixed it on trunk (when you add those options).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.