[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem
From: |
Hugo Raguet |
Subject: |
bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:07:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 |
On 06/01/2022 15:05, David Kastrup wrote:
Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes
...
...
It was a well-meant pitch but in the end did not manage to make it to my
home plate.
It is a pity from my point of view because I know there simply is no legal or
financial risk (my organization would just have paid for a service I need for
my work, without knowing further about it). But I also understand that David
Kastrup you do not want to take any risk, especially in view of the lack of
motivation.
So it's certainly not individuals vs. organization.
Fortunately for you guys, a small group of individuals has been found
who will pay to get your bug fixed.
Bug still pending...
He did say that the main thing I had to fear was getting blamed on the
mailing list for not doing what I had been paid for. It would appear
that this does not really depend all that much on payment.
Again, I hope you are not taking my previous message for a blame. There was no
agreement, so you have no obligation, so it is not your fault if the bug is
still pending.
I still think that it is good practice to update the status of the bug report ;
the last message was implying that we were on the verge of solving the problem.
Now if the bug is actually fixed by this “small group of individuals”, here
seems also a good place to report it!
Have you tried GNU AUCTeX 13.0.15 from
https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/auctex.html
with the preview.sty version shipping with that, yet?
Given that I am unable to reproduce the problem on my system (I have no
proper idea why), that would be a welcome data point.
I am not in good position to report if this version of AUCTeX is working,
because I actually never used AUCTeX. My attention came to this problem because
preview is actually used in packages such as pst-pdf (see for instance
https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/617229). If the fixed preview package make it
to texlive, I might be able to test it in the near future.
Regards, HR
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Hugo Raguet, 2022/01/06
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Tassilo Horn, 2022/01/06
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, David Kastrup, 2022/01/06
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem,
Hugo Raguet <=
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Tassilo Horn, 2022/01/06
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Hugo Raguet, 2022/01/06
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, David Kastrup, 2022/01/06
- bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Tassilo Horn, 2022/01/07
- bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Bruckmann, Tobias, 2022/01/07
- bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Tassilo Horn, 2022/01/07
- bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Ikumi Keita, 2022/01/07
- bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Arash Esbati, 2022/01/07
- bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Tassilo Horn, 2022/01/07
- bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem, Bruckmann, Tobias, 2022/01/07