[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.59d on OpenServer
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: 2.59d on OpenServer |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:03:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:21:54PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Kean Johnston wrote on Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:04:12PM CEST:
> > Wouldn't the path of least resistance be to simply set CONFIG_SHELL to
> > /usr/bin/bash on OSR5 and OSR6 and to /usr/bin/posix/sh on UnixWare 7
> > simply solve all of these problems?
>
> Sure, if /usr/bin/posix/sh also works fine. I thought it was
> /usr/bin/posix/sh that introduced the problems, though.
Hello,
it seems that it would be better to prefer bash over sh. And we
might search for bash in all dirs, then for /usr/bin/posix/sh (a
special case), then for sh everywher, then for ksh, etc.
But this stirs the shell selecion very much; it's obvious that it
has to wait after the release. Bnd I do not think any quick actioon is
neeeded rigt now.
Stepan
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, (continued)
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/18
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Kean Johnston, 2006/06/18
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Kean Johnston, 2006/06/19
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/19
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Kean Johnston, 2006/06/19
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/19
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Kean Johnston, 2006/06/19
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Tim Rice, 2006/06/19
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Tim Rice, 2006/06/20
Re: 2.59d on OpenServer, Tim Rice, 2006/06/19