Re: AC_PROG_LEX broken on IRIX with MIPSpro Compilers

[Peter O'Gorman]

Peter O'Gorman wrote:

> Now, looking at the expanded version, I am unsure if my patch is
> correct, is the test supposed to be that input() != 0 or that (yy_bp +
> input ()) != 0 ? At the moment, due to operator precedence, it is
> testing that  yy_bp + input () is non-zero, is that intentional?

Of course we're just testing that the thing builds, so this is not
important, adding the parentheses is the right thing.

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com