[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AT_DATA and AS_ECHO_N
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: AT_DATA and AS_ECHO_N |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:02:38 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-15) |
just to throw in my two cents:
* Joel E. Denny wrote on Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:47:04PM CEST:
> printf's lack of availability as a builtin (rather than lack of
> availability altogether) on some systems doesn't imply lack of portability
Some system's printf's are pretty buggy, too (core dump with long
arguments and so). info Autoconf "Limitations of Builtins" has
details.
Cheers,
Ralf
- AT_DATA and AS_ECHO_N (was: Re: Warn about character literals not of length one.), Joel E. Denny, 2009/07/25
- Re: AT_DATA and AS_ECHO_N, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/07/29
- [PATCH] Clarify comparison of echo, printf, and AS_ECHO*., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/07/30
- Re: [PATCH] Clarify comparison of echo, printf, and AS_ECHO*., Joel E. Denny, 2009/07/31