[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:05:27 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 06/13/2011 03:39 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> [3] The $(SHELL), which here we assume is ksh with close-on-exec, does a
> fork+exec to execute the test script; thus, when that script begins
> its execution, it has the fd 9 closed (d'oh!, but expected now);
Oddly enough, it looks like it is _only_ 'exec 9>&2' that suffers from
close-on-exec semantics; using '(blah) 9>&2' leaves fd 9 inheritable.
So maybe the real fix is to do the redirection to a subshell or grouping
{} rather than via exec, at which point even ksh and HP-UX sh will allow
the original stderr to be inherited as fd 9 to the child script process:
$ printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec >&9\n' > k
$ sh k
k[2]: 9: Generated or received a file descriptor number that is not valid.
$ sh k 9>&2
$ sh -c 'exec 9>&2; /bin/sh k'
k[2]: 9: Generated or received a file descriptor number that is not valid.
$ sh -c 'sh k 9>&2'
$ sh -c '(sh k) 9>&2'
$ sh -c '{ sh k;} 9>&2'
$
but I don't know if that will require some changes in automake's
parallel-test driver setup code.
And Autoconf should probably document that the close-on-exec semantics
of some shells applies only to the exec builtin, since they do not
happen to other redirections.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, (continued)
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Eric Blake, 2011/06/13
- Re: system call trace tools, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Jim Meyering, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Eric Blake, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Jim Meyering, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Eric Blake, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Eric Blake, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/14
- [PATCH] doc: mention more about ksh cloexec behavior, Eric Blake, 2011/06/13
- Re: [PATCH] doc: mention more about ksh cloexec behavior, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/14
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Eric Blake, 2011/06/13
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/14
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Jim Meyering, 2011/06/14
- Re: bug#8846: coreutils-8.12 on HP-UX 11.31: 3 of 365 tests failed, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/06/14