[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sub shell mit pipes
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Sub shell mit pipes |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:09:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Macintosh/20040803) |
Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:
In any case, the combinations < <(..) and > >(..) should be implemented
using pipes and so be available on all architectures supporting pipes,
even if named pipes are not available. Is this the case already?
No. While these are common idioms, I have not been willing to invent
syntax to encapsulate them. What you're looking at is something like
ksh coprocs, where Korn invented a syntax to specify them (|&) and
added options to various builtins and created new redirection syntax
to use them.
I prefer the more general composition of basic features.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet )
Live...Laugh...Love
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@po.CWRU.Edu
http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Sub shell mit pipes, Morard Jean-Louis, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Chet Ramey, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/12
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/12