bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SEGV on unbounded recursion


From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: SEGV on unbounded recursion
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:35:02 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)

address@hidden wrote:
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i686
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS:  -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686' 
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-redhat-linux-gnu' 
-DCONF_VENDOR='redhat' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='bash' -DSHELL 
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -I.  -I. -I./include -I./lib  -D_GNU_SOURCE 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall 
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables
uname output: Linux tjanouse.englab.brq.redhat.com 2.6.18-53.el5 #1 SMP Wed Oct 
10 16:34:02 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Machine Type: i686-redhat-linux-gnu

Bash Version: 3.2
Patch Level: 33
Release Status: release

Description:
        Unbounded recursion results in a SEGV instead of some error message
        telling you what happened. And the test case I'm attaching could also
        just run forever if something like tail recursion was handled.

I'm not inclined to change the current behavior.  Bash is perfectly
happy to allow people to shoot themselves in the foot.  We all agree
that fixed-limit recursion is not the way to go, and I don't think the
effort involved in handling tail recursion is well spent.

Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                       Live Strong.  No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]