Re: Bash for OS/2

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thursday 22 May 2008, Brendan Oakley wrote:
> With some effort and help, I have Bash 3.1 built and mostly working
> under OS/2. This uses gcc 3.3.5 with "kLIBC" 0.6.3, rather than the
> old EMX tools. 3.2 needs a bit more work, and some of the patches
> might need some more polish. My questions:
>
> Are you interested in these patches?
>
> If so, would you prefer I submit them in bits, for each individual
> fix, or do you want to see the whole thing in one big patch?
>
> Will you accept them now even though the effort is not yet complete,
> or would you rather I had Bash 3.2 working 100% with perfect style
> before you want to see it?

posting patches would probably be useful to the next random person who wants 
bash running on OS/2, but if you want to get included, writing proper patches 
against the latest release+patchset is the way to go.
-mike

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.