[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang
From: |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
Subject: |
Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:39:18 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6 |
Chet Ramey wrote:
> Yes, this is where the semantics of history expansion clash with traditional
> shell behavior. Only single quotes inhibit history expansion.
In that case, situation number 3 is producing the wrong result, since there
are no single quotes there, only a backslash.
Whichever way you look at it, there's still a bug.
Lawrence
- inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/16
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, pk, 2008/07/16
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <=
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, pk, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/19
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/19
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/20