Re: FIFO silently ignored on . ( `source´ ) command

[Chet Ramey]

On 12/12/11 7:54 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:

> I have
>     GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) on an
> up-to-date CentOS 5.7 (Final) x64,
> and
>     GNU bash, version 4.1.10(4)-release (i686-pc-cygwin) on Windows 7 x64 SP1.
> 
> In both OSes I noted that `source´ built-in does not work on a FIFO. On
> CentOS the command is just ignored, and on cygwin it blocks indefinitely (I
> guess).  Ok, cygwin FIFOs may not be a good test case, but  I think CentOS
> ones are.

This was changed about five years ago, before bash-4.0 was released.

> Here is my test example
> 
> address@hidden ~]# mkfifo /tmp/myfifo
> address@hidden ~]# echo ls -l >/tmp/myfifo &
> [2] 23771
> address@hidden ~]# source /tmp/myfifo        # no `ls´ output here...
> address@hidden ~]# rm /tmp/myfifo
> rm: remove fifo `/tmp/myfifo'? y
> [2]+  Exit 1                  echo ls -l > /tmp/myfifo
> address@hidden ~]#

This is a less-than-ideal example, since it attempts to execute the
`ls -l' output as commands.  Replacing the `ls -l' with `echo hello world'
results in `hello world' on bash-4.0, bash-4.1, and bash-4.2 on Mac OS X
and RHEL 5.

Chet

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/