Re: bash sends SIGHUP to disowned children in non-interactive mode

[ck850]

   >You could also "disown -h" it and avoid that the signal is sent at
   all.
   >This is especially helpful, if a program resets its signal handlers
   >(e.g. xemacs?).
   What I am saying is, this is not working!
   Please try if you can reproduce what I wrote.
   If so try to use disown -h. Doesn't make a difference.
   >If you want a process to ignore a signal, you should either use
   nohup(1),
   >or ignore the signal yourself using a trap and then exec it.
   I know about nohup but I don't want to ignore a SIGHUP.
   My point is that there is a SIGHUP sent although it shouldn't.
   Or can you explain why this signal is being send in the first place?
   regards

   SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
   kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! [1]http://f.web.de/?mc=021192

References

   1. http://f.web.de/?mc=021192