[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why must non-standard $IFS members be treated so differently ?
From: |
Dan Douglas |
Subject: |
Re: why must non-standard $IFS members be treated so differently ? |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jul 2012 10:19:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.4.6-pf+; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday, July 29, 2012 03:23:29 PM Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> echo $(count_args 1 2 3\ 4)
I should also have mentioned that I couldn't reproduce this case. You should
be getting 4 here in your example, not 3. I have the same Bash version. Are
you sure you were echoing address@hidden ' and not address@hidden', and also
that you did
not set IFS=: for count_args? If you use exactly the function you sent with
the default IFS then you should get 4 here.
--
Dan Douglas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.